Comment on ‘Stapp's theorem without counterfactual commitment’
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comment on "Bell's theorem without inequalities and without alignments".
A proof of Bell's theorem without inequalities is presented which exhibits three remarkable properties: (a). reduced local states are immune to collective decoherence; (b). distant local setups do not need to be aligned, since the required perfect correlations are achieved for any local rotation of the local setups; (c). local measurements require only individual measurements on the qubits. Ind...
متن کاملComment on “ Commitment Vs . Flexibility ”
This comment corrects two results in the 2006 Econometrica paper by Amador, Werning, and Angeletos (AWA), that features a model in which individuals face a tradeoff between flexibility and commitment. First, in contrast to Proposition 1 in AWA, we show that money-burning can be part of the ex ante optimal contract when there are two states. Second, in contrast to Proposition 2 in AWA, we show t...
متن کاملQuantum Bit Commitment Protocol Based on Counterfactual Quantum Cryptography
We present a new quantum bit commitment (QBC) protocol based on counterfactual quantum cryptography. We analyze the security of this protocol, find that it can resist the attack presented by QBC’s no-go theorem. Our protocol is simple, and probably gives a new way of constructing QBC protocol.
متن کاملTo “ Comment on ‘ Commitment Vs . Flexibility ’ ” (
IN THE APPENDIX of Ambrus and Egorov (2013), the proof of Proposition 3 contained only the idea of proof of the result that w(θp) < z(u(θp)) is possible, so money-burning for high types is possible. Here, we present the complete proof of this fact. Our strategy is to build on Example 1, approximate it with a continuous distribution, and show that, for sufficiently close approximations, the opti...
متن کاملA Comment on Commitment and Flexibility∗
This comment corrects two results in the 2006 Econometrica paper by Amador, Werning and Angeletos (AWA), that features a model in which individuals face a trade-off between flexibility and commitment. First, in contrast to Proposition 1 in AWA, we show that money-burning can be part of the ex ante optimal contract when there are two states. Second, in contrast to Proposition 2 in AWA, we show t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
سال: 1994
ISSN: 0039-3681
DOI: 10.1016/0039-3681(94)90070-1